Your Game-Changing AI Prompts In Pre-verbal Economy
Why most people use AI wrong—and how to unlock what's already inside you with AI
What You’ll Get:
AI Prompt to self-author your thinking
Access to July’s weekly AI Prompts Office Hours
10% discount on next cohort (starting mid-Aug)
Get everything for just $12/month or $99/year. Subscribe now and you'll never get a price increase in the future. You can unsubscribe anytime
Most people who complain about AI are under-leveraging its power.
The more they under-leverage it, the more reasons they have to complain—
making them right about their complaints.
They believe AI is just for optimizing existing workflows:
"Help me summarize [X]"
"Give me a [Y] plan"
"Write [Z] better."
That's the optimization paradigm.
Like setting horses on wheels.
Old logic, just faster.
Optimization vs. Orientation
Here, we're using AI completely differently. We're not asking it to execute faster or be our intern.
Instead, we're asking it to reveal the richness in our pre-verbal thinking.
To fill the gaps in how we relate to our own thinking.
Not to optimize. But to orient.
This is particularly relevant for those exploring liminal spaces—the in-between spaces where there is no map.
AI becomes a scaffolding for your thinking.
The question is:
What kind of scaffolding does it use?
Expert Free Prompts
There are always a bunch of experts who have a model or method on how to do things.
That assumes there's a right way to do things.
And then we have the AI Prompt experts.
They load AI with what those experts advise—decision-making frameworks, leadership models, marketing methods—so you can have your intern turned into PhD assistant.
It's the consultant turned into AI.
The marketer turned into AI.
The coach turned into AI.
That's the logical step.
But here’s what nobody’s talking about:
That entire logic is replicating the same old system that's already breaking.
When everyone uses the same old ideas, the whole system becomes a race to zero—
an "Ant Death Spiral" of thinking.
That's why people complain about AI.
And they are right!
People are not using AI to think—
They’re using it to reaffirm.
The Trap of Second-Hand Clarity
Here's what's really happening with typical AI prompts:
Input → Dominant Thinking → Output
Dominant Thinking is the hidden framework baked into the system—
institutional logic about what's considered rational, efficient, and useful.
You give your situation,
it applies this Dominant Thinking (often hidden),
and gives you a clear, well-articulated answer.
That’s efficient.
But it’s also a trap.
Why?
You're not getting your clarity back.
You're using second-hand clarity.
And that creates an internal disorder.
Our Approach: First-Hand Clarity
Now contrast that with what we’re doing:
Input → Personal Resonance → Insight
Instead of loading AI with expert frameworks, you show it your raw thinking—
your uncertainties, contradictions, half-formed ideas.
The goal isn’t to force Dominant Thinking into you.
It's to surface the pre-verbal clarity already moving inside you—before it can be named, justified, or explained.
Our AI Prompts aren't trained on psychological models or leadership theories.
They stay model-free—
so you can develop your own reasoning.
This isn’t clarity you inherit.
It’s clarity you author.
Why Does This Matter?
Users are starting to describe our AI prompts as "gamechanging."
The reason?
Here's what’s happening:
As you go through life, you get flashes of insights that resonate deeply but you can't put into words.
These insights feel 'weird' because they don't fit in current logic—what we call your Rare Dots.
You're pulled toward new ways of seeing things, but you don't know how to use them.
Algorithms follow patterns.
Artists break patterns.
The problem isn't that you don't know enough.
It's that you lack structure to name, use, and build from what's already inside you.
That's where our AI Prompts help:
1. The Translation Gap
One user said:
"It's astonishing to see what was in the back of my brain come forward."
Your best insights are stuck without words. You can't use what you can't name. The prompts give you language for what you already know.
2. The Actionable Gap
As another user put it:
“It’s helping me make my ideas actionable. A catalyst for change.”
You get powerful ideas but can't move on them. You're stuck between knowing and doing. The prompts help you set the right intention.
3. The Meaning Gap
"It was like a mirror saying: here's the signal—you might want to run with it."
You feel something meaningful but only trust what seems logical.
You ignore inner signals that could guide you toward what actually matters.
Our prompts help you trust and act on deeper knowing beyond just rational thinking.
Without these structures, your uniqueness dies unutilized.
Which leads us to the AI prompt this week:
Observer Mode vs. Participant Mode
There are two modes you relate to life.
Observer Mode
Watches life from the outside
Adds layers of abstraction
Lives through other people’s models and ideas
Participant Mode
Engages directly with life
Holds the tension without retreating
Thinks from lived uncertainty—not distant clarity
The problem?
Since the Enlightenment, we've built systems that reward observation over participation.
Education systems treat learning as consumption, not transformation.
Institutions honor abstract analysis over lived experience.
The result?
Describing your world becomes a substitute for changing your world.
People read the books.
Learn the models.
Memorise the frameworks.
But they confuse insight with movement.
Perspective with participation.
Clarity with transformation.
We have a strata of educated people who analyse their world with elegance—
but can’t change it.
"But How Can I Know Which Mode I’m Stuck In?"
That's what the AI Prompts below address.